Adam and Brandi Roussel v. Daniel Andrew Moore, Allyson Michelle Thibodeaux, Katie Moore Desselle, Pennant Real Estate, LLC, Kevin Dinkel, Advantage Services, Inc, Republic-Vanguard Insurance Company

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 31, 2022
Docket2021CW1452
StatusUnknown

This text of Adam and Brandi Roussel v. Daniel Andrew Moore, Allyson Michelle Thibodeaux, Katie Moore Desselle, Pennant Real Estate, LLC, Kevin Dinkel, Advantage Services, Inc, Republic-Vanguard Insurance Company (Adam and Brandi Roussel v. Daniel Andrew Moore, Allyson Michelle Thibodeaux, Katie Moore Desselle, Pennant Real Estate, LLC, Kevin Dinkel, Advantage Services, Inc, Republic-Vanguard Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adam and Brandi Roussel v. Daniel Andrew Moore, Allyson Michelle Thibodeaux, Katie Moore Desselle, Pennant Real Estate, LLC, Kevin Dinkel, Advantage Services, Inc, Republic-Vanguard Insurance Company, (La. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

ADAM AND BRANDI ROUSSEL NO. 2021 CW 1452

VERSUS

DANIEL ANDREW MOORE, ALLYSON MICHELLE THIBODEAUX, KATIE MOORE DESSELLE, PENNANT REAL ESTATE, L. L. C., KEVIN DINKEL, JANUARY 31, 2022 ADVANTAGE SERVICES, INC., AND REPUBLIC - VANGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY

In Re: Advantage Services, Inc. and Kevin Dinkel, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 130637.

BEFORE: MCDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. The transcript of the July 7, 2021 hearing on defendants' " Dilatory Exception of Prematurity and,

Alternatively, Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration and Assess Costs" reveals no evidence was introduced or admitted during the hearing, including the subject arbitration agreement. The party seeking to enforce an arbitration agreement carries the burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement. FIA Card Services, N. A. v. Weaver, 2010- 1372 ( La. 3/ 15/ 11), 62 So. 3d 709, 719; see also La. Code Civ. P. art. 930; Landis Construction Co., L. L. C. v. State, 2015- 1167 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 2/ 29/ 16), 199 So. 3d 1, 2- 3 (" Evidence not properly and officially offered and introduced cannot be considered, even if it is physically placed in the record."). Accordingly, the trial court did not err in denying defendants' exception and

alternative motion.

JMM WIL EW

ri

DEPUTY ERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

FIA Card Services, N.A. v. Weaver
62 So. 3d 709 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2011)
Landis Construction Co. v. State
199 So. 3d 1 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Adam and Brandi Roussel v. Daniel Andrew Moore, Allyson Michelle Thibodeaux, Katie Moore Desselle, Pennant Real Estate, LLC, Kevin Dinkel, Advantage Services, Inc, Republic-Vanguard Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adam-and-brandi-roussel-v-daniel-andrew-moore-allyson-michelle-lactapp-2022.