Adalberto Mosqueda Guajardo v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 3, 2018
Docket13-17-00509-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Adalberto Mosqueda Guajardo v. State (Adalberto Mosqueda Guajardo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adalberto Mosqueda Guajardo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-17-00509-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ADALBERTO MOSQUEDA GUAJARDO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the State’s unopposed first amended motion for

abatement of appeal. The reporter’s record was filed on May 22, 2018 and appellant

filed a second amended brief on July 11, 2018. The State advises this Court appellant

did not designate for inclusion in the appellate record the reporter’s record for certain

pretrial proceedings which are necessary to prepare a proper brief in response to appellant’s assertion of violation of the right to speedy trial.

When a relevant item has been omitted from the reporter’s record, the trial court,

the appellate court, or any party may by letter direct the official court reporter to prepare,

certify, and file in the appellate court a supplemental reporter’s record containing the

omitted items. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(d). The State has filed a designation of

additional record with the court reporter for numerous pretrial proceedings and requests

this Court abate the appeal until the additional reporter’s records are filed.

The Court, having fully examined and considered the State’s unopposed first

amended motion to abate the appeal, is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, the

motion should be granted. Accordingly, the State’s unopposed first amended motion to

abate the appeal is GRANTED and the appeal is ABATED.

The appeal will be reinstated upon receipt of the supplemental reporter’s record as

designated is filed, and upon further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 3rd day of August, 2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Adalberto Mosqueda Guajardo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adalberto-mosqueda-guajardo-v-state-texapp-2018.