A.D.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

A.D.A. v. State

564 So. 2d 615, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5751, 1990 WL 110301

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 31, 1990

DocketNo. 90-598

StatusPublished

This text of 564 So. 2d 615 (A.D.A. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A.D.A. v. State, 564 So. 2d 615, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5751, 1990 WL 110301 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

NIMMONS, Judge.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying the appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. We disagree. However, the term of community control imposed by the court is in excess of that permitted by law.

This juvenile was charged with and found guilty of petit theft. As we have previously held, the maximum period of community control which may be imposed for petit theft is 60 days. J.S. v. State, 552 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). As we stated in J.S., this result is dictated by the provisions of Sections 39.11(l)(a)l. and 39.-11(4), Florida Statutes.

Accordingly, the subject disposition order is affirmed except for the term of community control as to which the order is re[616]*616versed and remanded for the entry of an amended order consistent with this opinion.

WENTWORTH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI