A.D.A. v. State

564 So. 2d 615, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5751, 1990 WL 110301
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1990·No. No. 90-598·Published

Opinion

NIMMONS, Judge.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying the appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. We disagree. However, the term of community control imposed by the court is in excess of that permitted by law.

This juvenile was charged with and found guilty of petit theft. As we have previously held, the maximum period of community control which may be imposed for petit theft is 60 days. J.S. v. State, 552 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). As we stated in J.S., this result is dictated by the provisions of Sections 39.11(l)(a)l. and 39.-11(4), Florida Statutes.

Accordingly, the subject disposition order is affirmed except for the term of community control as to which the order is re[616]*616versed and remanded for the entry of an amended order consistent with this opinion.

WENTWORTH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A.D.A. v. State, 564 So. 2d 615, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5751, 1990 WL 110301 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

564 So. 2d 615 (A.D.A. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of J.S. v. State
552 So. 2d 327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)