Ada M. Clay, and Ada M. Clay as of the Estate of Wallace M. Clay, Deceased v. Sinclair Refining Company, a Corporation, Sinclair Refining Company, a Corporation v. Ada M. Clay, and Ada M. Clay as of the Estate of Wallace M. Clay, Deceased

194 F.2d 532
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 1952
Docket11389_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 F.2d 532 (Ada M. Clay, and Ada M. Clay as of the Estate of Wallace M. Clay, Deceased v. Sinclair Refining Company, a Corporation, Sinclair Refining Company, a Corporation v. Ada M. Clay, and Ada M. Clay as of the Estate of Wallace M. Clay, Deceased) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ada M. Clay, and Ada M. Clay as of the Estate of Wallace M. Clay, Deceased v. Sinclair Refining Company, a Corporation, Sinclair Refining Company, a Corporation v. Ada M. Clay, and Ada M. Clay as of the Estate of Wallace M. Clay, Deceased, 194 F.2d 532 (6th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

194 F.2d 532

Ada M. CLAY, and Ada M. Clay as Executrix of the Estate of Wallace M. Clay, Deceased, Defendants-Appellants
v.
SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee.
SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
Ada M. CLAY, and Ada M. Clay as Executrix of the Estate of Wallace M. Clay, Deceased, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11388.

No. 11389.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

January 21, 1952.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.

Carpenter & Carpenter, Tiffin, Ohio, for Ada M. Clay.

Hubert B. Fuller, Cleveland, Ohio, Eugene M. Hines, Chicago, Ill., for Sinclair Refining Co.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal and cross-appeal were heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and upon consideration thereof the Court is of the opinion that there is no reversible error upon the record.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and the same is in all things affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the memorandum Opinion of the District Judge filed January 4, 1951, 102 F. Supp. 732 and the findings of fact and conclusions of law filed January 16, 1951.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castrucci v. Young
515 N.E.2d 658 (Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 F.2d 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ada-m-clay-and-ada-m-clay-as-of-the-estate-of-wallace-m-clay-deceased-ca6-1952.