Ada Bell Brown and Beverly J. Everett, Marion Evertt Barton, and Gerald Joseph Everett v. Ralph Everett (Individually) and as of the Estate of Joseph Robert Everett

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided October 2, 1996·No. 03A01-9605-00174·Published

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

EASTERN SECTI ON FILED October 2, 1996 ADA BELL BROW a nd BEVERLY N ) C/ A NO. 03A01- 9605- 00174 Cecil Crowson, Jr. J . EVERETT, MARI ON EVERETT ) Appellate C ourt Clerk BARTON, a nd GERALD J OSEPH ) BLEDSOE LAW EVERETT, ) ) HON. BUDDY L. PERRY, Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l e e s , ) J UDGE ) v. ) ) RALPH EVERETT ( i ndi vi dua l l y ) a n d a s Exe c ut or of t he Es t a t e ) o f J o s e ph Robe r t Eve r e t t ) , ) HERBERT D. EVERETT, J AM ES R. ) EVERETT, DORI S D. HI GGI NS, ) KATI E T. TOM NSON a nd LAURA ) LI SHAW , ) AFFI RMED ) AND De f e nda nt s - Appe l l a n t s . ) REMANDED

DAVI D R. SW AFFORD, SW AFFORD & SWAFFORD, Pi ke vi l l e , f or Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l e e s .

EDW N Z. KELLY, J R. , KELLY, KELLY & GOUGER, P. C. , J a s pe r , f o r I De f e n d a nt s - Appe l l a nt s , Ra l ph Eve r e t t , J a me s R. Eve r e t t , Dor i s D. Hi g gi ns , Ka t i e G. Toml i ns on, a nd La ur a Sha w.

O P I N I O N

Fr a nks . J .

I n t hi s c ont e s t of t he wi l l of t he de c e a s e d, J os e p h

Ev e r e t t , a j ur y r e t ur ne d s pe c i a l ve r di c t s t ha t t he de c e a s e d

d i d n o t ha ve s uf f i c i e nt me nt a l c a pa c i t y t o ma ke a va l i d wi l l , a n d J os e ph Robe r t Eve r e t t , De c e a s e d, wa s undul y i nf l ue nc e d b y

Ra l p h Eve r e t t on M r c h 11 t o t he e xt e nt t ha t s uc h i nf l ue nc e a

a mo u n t e d t o c oe r c i on, de s t r oyi ng t he f r e e wi l l of t he de c e a s e d

a n d s ubs t i t ut i ng hi s wi l l f or t he de c e a s e d a nd c ompe l l i ng t h e

d e c e a s e d t o ma ke a di s pos i t i on he ot he r wi s e woul d not ha ve

ma de .

The de f e nda nt s ha ve a ppe a l e d a nd r a i s e s e ve r a l

i s s ue s .

The de c e a s e d ha d e i ght c hi l dr e n. The ol de s t

c hi l d r e n we r e a ppe l l e e s Ada Be l l Br own a nd W l t e r Eve r e t t 1 . a

Th e y f i l e d s ui t c ha l l e ng i ng de c e de nt ’ s M r c h 1991 wi l l , whi c h a

l e f t t he m t e n dol l a r s e a c h a nd di vi de d t he r e ma i nde r of hi s

e s t a t e e qua l l y a mong hi s s i x younge r c hi l dr e n. The y a l l e ge d

t h a t d e c e de nt wa s of uns ound mi nd, i nc ompe t e nt t o ma ke a wi l l ,

a n d u n dul y i nf l ue nc e d by de f e nda nt Ra l ph Eve r e t t . Af t e r t he

j u r y v e r di c t t he pr oba t e of t he wi l l wa s a nnul l e d a nd va c a t e d .

W t hi n one mont h of t he e xe c ut i on of t he wi l l , t he i

Ch a n c e r y Cour t of Bl e ds oe Count y, Te nne s s e e ha d f ound de c e d e n t

t o b e c ompe t e nt a nd di s mi s s e d a c ons e r va t or s hi p pr oc e e di ng.

Ap p e l l a nt s a r gue t ha t t he Tr i a l Cour t s houl d ha ve gr a nt e d

t h e i r Pr e - Tr i a l M i on i n Li mi ne t ha t woul d ha ve pr e c l ude d t h e ot

p l a i n t i f f s f r om a ny pr oof r e l a t i ve t o t he c ompe t e nc y of

d e c e d e nt pr i or t o t hi s he a r i ng. The y i ns i s t t ha t s uc h

e v i d e n c e c ons t i t ut e d a r e l i t i ga t i on of de c e de nt ’ s me nt a l

c a p a c i t y i n 1991 a nd i s ba r r e d by c ol l a t e r a l e s t oppe l .

Col l a t e r a l e s t oppe l ope r a t e s t o ba r a s e c ond s ui t

1 W l t e r Ev e r e t t d i e d i n 1 9 9 3 ; h i s c h i l d r e n M r i o n Ev e r e t t Ba r t o n a n d a a Ge r a l d J o s e p h Ev e r e t t we r e s u b s t i t u t e d a s p l a i n t i f f s i n p l a c e o f t h e i r f a t he r .

2 b e t we e n t he s a me pa r t i e s a nd t he i r pr i vi e s on a di f f e r e nt

c a us e of a c t i on o nl y a s t o i s s ue s whi c h we r e a c t ua l l y

l i t i g a t e d a nd d e t e r mi ne d i n t he f or me r s ui t . Goe k e v . Wood s ,

7 7 7 S. W 2d 347 ( Te nn. 1989) . .

The pa r t i e s t o t he 1991 t r i a l we r e Ra l ph Eve r e t t a s

Pe t i t i one r , de c e de nt J os e ph Eve r e t t a s r e s ponde nt , pl a i nt i f f

W l t e r Eve r e t t a s r e s pon de nt ’ s a t t or ne y i n f a c t , a nd t he Fi r s t a

Na t i o n a l Ba nk. The j udge di s mi s s e d t he pe t i t i on s e e ki ng t he

a p p o i nt me nt of a c ons e r va t or a nd r e t ur ne d a l l a s s e t s he l d b y

W l t e r Eve r e t t t o d e c e de nt . a

The pa r t i e s a nd i s s ue s we r e not i de nt i c a l . Howe ve r ,

b o t h he a r i ngs de a l t wi t h t he i s s ue of de c e de nt ’ s c ompe t e nc y

a n d i t c oul d be a r gue d t ha t Ada Be l l ’ s i nt e r e s t s we r e

r e p r e s e nt e d by he r br ot he r . Howe ve r , e ve n i f t he r e a r gua bl y

wa s a n y c ol l a t e r a l e s t oppe l f r om t hi s he a r i ng, t he Te nne s s e e

Su p r e me Cour t ha s he l d t ha t :

The e s t oppe l of a j udgme nt e xt e nds onl y t o t he f a c t s i n i s s ue a s t he y e xi s t e d a t t he t i me t he j udgme nt wa s r e nde r e d, a nd doe s not pr e ve nt a r e - e xa mi na t i o n of t he s a me que s t i on be t we e n t he s a me pa r t i e s whe r e i n t he i nt e r v a l t he f a c t s ha ve c ha nge d or ne w f a c t s ha ve oc c ur r e d whi c h ma y a l t e r t he l e ga l r i ght s or r e l a t i ons o f t he l i t i ga nt s .

W i t e v . W t e , 876 S. W 2d 837 ( Te nn. 1994) . h hi .

He r e , t he de c e de nt ’ s de a t h f r om Al z he i me r ’ s wa r r a nt s

a r e - e va l ua t i on o f whe n t he di s e a s e ma y ha ve be gun a f f e c t i ng

h i s j u dgme nt . The Tr i a l Cour t di d not e r r i n a l l owi ng

t e s t i mony a nd pr oof a s t o hi s c ompe t e nc y a t t he t i me he

e x e c u t e d h i s wi l l .

A s e c ond c ons e r va t or s hi p pr oc e e di ng wa s he l d mor e

t ha n a y e a r a f t e r t he e xe c ut i on of t he wi l l . At t ha t t i me ,

d e c e de nt wa s d e c l a r e d u na bl e t o ha ndl e hi s a f f a i r s , a nd

3 d e f e n da nt Ra l ph Eve r e t t wa s a ppoi nt e d a s c ons e r va t or .

De f e n d a nt s a r gue t ha t t he s e c ond c ons e r va t or s hi p pr oc e e di ng i s

t o o r e mot e a nd not r e l e va nt t o t he de c e de nt ’ s s t a t e of mi nd

wh e n t he wi l l wa s dr a wn.

The c ompe t e nc y t o ma ke a wi l l i s me a s ur e d a t t he

t i me t he pe r s on e xe c ut e s t he wi l l a nd not by t he i r me nt a l

c o n d i t i on a n unr e a s ona bl e numbe r of ye a r s be f or e or a f t e r . In

r e Es t at e of M e s , 843 S. W 2d 418, 427 ( Te nn. App. 1992) . ay .

Ev i d e n c e of t he t e s t a t or ’ s me nt a l c ondi t i on a f t e r ma ki ng t h e

wi l l i s a dmi s s i bl e , wi t hi n ?r e a s ona bl e l i mi t s ?, I d. , quot i ng

Pr i t c h a r d on W l l s a nd Admi ni s t r a t i on of Es t a t e s , §98 a t 14 1 . i

He r e , i t wa s r e a s ona bl e t o a l l ow e vi de nc e of t he

c o n s e r va t or s hi p he a r i ng he l d wi t hi n 14 mont hs . M es. ay Thi s

i s s u e i s r e l e va nt i n de t e r mi ni ng t he pr ogr e s s wi t h whi c h

Al z he i me r ’ s d i s e a s e ma y ha ve be c ome mor e de bi l i t a t i ng.

Te n n e s s e e Rul e s of Evi de nc e , 401 2 .

Ne xt , d e f e nda n t s i ns i s t t ha t t he Tr i a l Cour t e r r e d

i n a l l owi ng t he t e s t i mony of Dr . St ua r t Ba c on a nd J oa n De Bo r d .

Dr . Ba c on f i r s t s a w de c e de nt i n M r c h of 1992, j us t ove r a a

y e a r a f t e r t he e xe c ut i on of t he wi l l . He t e s t i f i e d t ha t ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ada Bell Brown and Beverly J. Everett, Marion Evertt Barton, and Gerald Joseph Everett v. Ralph Everett (Individually) and as of the Estate of Joseph Robert Everett, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).

Ada Bell Brown and Beverly J. Everett, Marion Evertt Barton, and Gerald Joseph Everett v. Ralph Everett (Individually) and as of the Estate of Joseph Robert Everett (Ada Bell Brown and Beverly J. Everett, Marion Evertt Barton, and Gerald Joseph Everett v. Ralph Everett (Individually) and as of the Estate of Joseph Robert Everett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. Smith
779 S.W.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1989)
In Re Estate of Mayes
843 S.W.2d 418 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1992)
White v. White
876 S.W.2d 837 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1994)
Cabaniss v. Grayburg Oil Co.
50 S.W.2d 437 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)