Ad Press, Ltd. v. Feiner, Curtis, Smith & Goldman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Ad Press, Ltd. v. Feiner, Curtis, Smith & Goldman

88 Misc. 2d 121, 387 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1976 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2593

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 13, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 88 Misc. 2d 121 (Ad Press, Ltd. v. Feiner, Curtis, Smith & Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ad Press, Ltd. v. Feiner, Curtis, Smith & Goldman, 88 Misc. 2d 121, 387 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1976 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In view of the finding by the court below, which is amply supported by the record, that defendant’s liability for printing costs had been established, the judgment dismissing the complaint because of deficiencies in proof as to the extent of plaintiffs damages should not be permitted to stand and plaintiff should be afforded the opportunity to supply the necessary proof on that issue. (See Haas v Wertheim, 266 App Div 672; Frenchman & Sweet v Philco Discount Corp., 21 AD2d 180; CPLR 5522.)

Judgment entered September 9, 1975 (Blyn, J.) reversed, without costs, judgment is directed in favor of plaintiff against defendant on the issue of liability and the matter is remitted to the trial court for a new trial on the issue of damages.

Concur: Markowitz, P. J., Hughes and Riccobono, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In view of the finding by the court below, which is amply supported by the record, that defendant’s liability for printing costs had been established, the judgment dismissing the complaint because of deficiencies in proof as to the extent of plaintiffs damages should not be permitted to stand and plaintiff should be afforded the opportunity to supply the necessary proof on that issue. (See Haas v Wertheim, 266 App Div 672; Frenchman & Sweet v Philco Discount Corp., 21 AD2d 180; CPLR 5522.)

Judgment entered September 9, 1975 (Blyn, J.) reversed, without costs, judgment is directed in favor of plaintiff against defendant on the issue of liability and the matter is remitted to the trial court for a new trial on the issue of damages.

Concur: Markowitz, P. J., Hughes and Riccobono, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 Misc. 2d 121, 387 N.Y.S.2d 31, 1976 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ad-press-ltd-v-feiner-curtis-smith-goldman-nyappterm-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack