Acwoo International Steel Corp. v. Frenkel & Co.

192 A.D.2d 463, 597 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4333
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Acwoo International Steel Corp. v. Frenkel & Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 165 A.D.2d 752

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered on or about October 2, 1992, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment as to liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that "the documentary evidence submitted is replete with inconsistencies” raising issues of fact, including whether the coverage in place on the date of the loss included rust, oxidation and discoloration damage caused by fresh water as well as sea water, and, if not, whether the limitation to sea water damage was authorized by plaintiff. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acwoo International Steel Corp. v. Frenkel & Co., 192 A.D.2d 463, 597 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

192 A.D.2d 463 (Acwoo International Steel Corp. v. Frenkel & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.