Acwoo International Steel Corp. v. Frenkel & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Acwoo International Steel Corp. v. Frenkel & Co.

192 A.D.2d 463, 597 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4333

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.D.2d 463 (Acwoo International Steel Corp. v. Frenkel & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Acwoo International Steel Corp. v. Frenkel & Co., 192 A.D.2d 463, 597 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered on or about October 2, 1992, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment as to liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that "the documentary evidence submitted is replete with inconsistencies” raising issues of fact, including whether the coverage in place on the date of the loss included rust, oxidation and discoloration damage caused by fresh water as well as sea water, and, if not, whether the limitation to sea water damage was authorized by plaintiff. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered on or about October 2, 1992, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment as to liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that "the documentary evidence submitted is replete with inconsistencies” raising issues of fact, including whether the coverage in place on the date of the loss included rust, oxidation and discoloration damage caused by fresh water as well as sea water, and, if not, whether the limitation to sea water damage was authorized by plaintiff. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 463, 597 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acwoo-international-steel-corp-v-frenkel-co-nyappdiv-1993.