A.C.W. v. State

667 So. 2d 474, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 735, 1996 WL 35186
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2176
StatusPublished

This text of 667 So. 2d 474 (A.C.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A.C.W. v. State, 667 So. 2d 474, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 735, 1996 WL 35186 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the juvenile court was without .jurisdiction to enter two civil final judgments to enforce previously entered restitution orders against A.C.W., who is now twenty years old. The law in effect at the time he committed his offenses (May 1991 and January 1992) did not authorize the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce restitution orders beyond his nineteenth birthday. § 39.022(4), Fla.Stat. (1991); C.L.D. v. Beauchamp, 464 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Accordingly, we REVERSE.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of C.L.D. v. Beauchamp
464 So. 2d 1264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 So. 2d 474, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 735, 1996 WL 35186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acw-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.