A.C.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

A.C.W. v. State

667 So. 2d 474, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 735, 1996 WL 35186

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1996·No. No. 95-2176·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the juvenile court was without .jurisdiction to enter two civil final judgments to enforce previously entered restitution orders against A.C.W., who is now twenty years old. The law in effect at the time he committed his offenses (May 1991 and January 1992) did not authorize the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce restitution orders beyond his nineteenth birthday. § 39.022(4), Fla.Stat. (1991); C.L.D. v. Beauchamp, 464 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Accordingly, we REVERSE.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the juvenile court was without .jurisdiction to enter two civil final judgments to enforce previously entered restitution orders against A.C.W., who is now twenty years old. The law in effect at the time he committed his offenses (May 1991 and January 1992) did not authorize the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce restitution orders beyond his nineteenth birthday. § 39.022(4), Fla.Stat. (1991); C.L.D. v. Beauchamp, 464 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Accordingly, we REVERSE.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

A.C.W. v. State, 667 So. 2d 474, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 735, 1996 WL 35186 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

667 So. 2d 474 (A.C.W. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related