A.C.W. v. State
This text of 667 So. 2d 474 (A.C.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We hold that the juvenile court was without .jurisdiction to enter two civil final judgments to enforce previously entered restitution orders against A.C.W., who is now twenty years old. The law in effect at the time he committed his offenses (May 1991 and January 1992) did not authorize the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce restitution orders beyond his nineteenth birthday. § 39.022(4), Fla.Stat. (1991); C.L.D. v. Beauchamp, 464 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Accordingly, we REVERSE.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 So. 2d 474, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 735, 1996 WL 35186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acw-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.