Acupuncture Approach, P.C. v. Global Liberty Ins. Co. of NY

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 11, 2019
Docket2019 NYSlipOp 51631(U)
StatusPublished

This text of Acupuncture Approach, P.C. v. Global Liberty Ins. Co. of NY (Acupuncture Approach, P.C. v. Global Liberty Ins. Co. of NY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acupuncture Approach, P.C. v. Global Liberty Ins. Co. of NY, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion



Acupuncture Approach, P.C., as Assignee of Darrell Johnson, Respondent,

against

Global Liberty Ins. Co. of NY, Appellant.


Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. (Jason Tenenbaum of counsel), for appellant. Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Stefan Belinfanti of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Michael Gerstein, J.), entered August 15, 2017. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,342.08.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

At the commencement of a nonjury trial in this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the parties stipulated that the sole issue was whether the letters scheduling plaintiff's assignor's examinations under oath (EUOs) were timely and properly mailed. The only witness at trial was an employee of defendant who testified as to defendant's policies and procedures regarding mailing EUO scheduling letters.

Contrary to the finding of the Civil Court, defendant established that the initial and follow-up letters scheduling an EUO had been timely and properly mailed (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]).

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.



ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: October 11, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Vincent's Hospital v. Government Employees Insurance
50 A.D.3d 1123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Acupuncture Approach, P.C. v. Global Liberty Ins. Co. of NY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acupuncture-approach-pc-v-global-liberty-ins-co-of-ny-nyappterm-2019.