Acunto v. Wiggins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Acunto v. Wiggins

234 A.D. 705

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1931·Published

Opinion

Order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the first cause of action in the amended complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the repre[706] sentation that there was no easement on the property contracted to be sold was one of fact and not an opinion or a conclusion of law. (Municipal Metallic Bed Mfg. Corp. v. Dobbs, 253 N. Y. 313; Van Slochem v. Villard, 207 id. 587; Carr v. Sanger, 138 App. Div. 32.) Defendant upon payment of costs and disbursements herein allowed may serve her answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the first cause of action in the amended complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the repre[706] sentation that there was no easement on the property contracted to be sold was one of fact and not an opinion or a conclusion of law. (Municipal Metallic Bed Mfg. Corp. v. Dobbs, 253 N. Y. 313; Van Slochem v. Villard, 207 id. 587; Carr v. Sanger, 138 App. Div. 32.) Defendant upon payment of costs and disbursements herein allowed may serve her answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Acunto v. Wiggins, 234 A.D. 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

234 A.D. 705 (Acunto v. Wiggins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related