Acunto v. Wiggins

234 A.D. 705

This text of 234 A.D. 705 (Acunto v. Wiggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acunto v. Wiggins, 234 A.D. 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the first cause of action in the amended complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the repre[706]*706sentation that there was no easement on the property contracted to be sold was one of fact and not an opinion or a conclusion of law. (Municipal Metallic Bed Mfg. Corp. v. Dobbs, 253 N. Y. 313; Van Slochem v. Villard, 207 id. 587; Carr v. Sanger, 138 App. Div. 32.) Defendant upon payment of costs and disbursements herein allowed may serve her answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Municipal Metallic Bed Manufacturing Corp. v. Dobbs
171 N.E. 75 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Carr v. Sanger
138 A.D. 32 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D. 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acunto-v-wiggins-nyappdiv-1931.