Acunto v. De La Rosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Acunto v. De La Rosa

56 A.D.2d 881, 392 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11260

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 881 (Acunto v. De La Rosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Acunto v. De La Rosa, 56 A.D.2d 881, 392 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11260 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover arrears of alimony and child support, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 27, 1976, which denied heir motion for summary judgment and (2) so much of an order of the same court, dated November 16, 1976, as denied her motion to modify the terms of a judgment of divorce by requiring defendant to pay the college costs for their two children. Defendant cross-appeals from so much of the latter order as, inter alia, required him to pay a counsel fee and failed to comply with the terms of the court’s decision. Order dated August 27, 1976 affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Order dated November 16, 1976 modified by deleting from the fourth decretal paragraph thereof the words "son John Gerard de la Rosa” and substituting therefor the word "children”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. It is apparent that the wording of the order dated November 16, 1976 did not comport with Special Term’s decision. The discrepancy has therefore been corrected. The orders appealed from were otherwise properly made. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover arrears of alimony and child support, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 27, 1976, which denied heir motion for summary judgment and (2) so much of an order of the same court, dated November 16, 1976, as denied her motion to modify the terms of a judgment of divorce by requiring defendant to pay the college costs for their two children. Defendant cross-appeals from so much of the latter order as, inter alia, required him to pay a counsel fee and failed to comply with the terms of the court’s decision. Order dated August 27, 1976 affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Order dated November 16, 1976 modified by deleting from the fourth decretal paragraph thereof the words "son John Gerard de la Rosa” and substituting therefor the word "children”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. It is apparent that the wording of the order dated November 16, 1976 did not comport with Special Term’s decision. The discrepancy has therefore been corrected. The orders appealed from were otherwise properly made. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 881, 392 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acunto-v-de-la-rosa-nyappdiv-1977.