Acuff's Appeal

9 A. 319, 6 Sadler 291, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 618
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 2, 1887·No. No. 463, E. D.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal from the first decree was not taken in time to authorize us to review it under the statute. The refusal of the court to open the decree rests in the sound discretion of the court, and the record shows no fact which will permit an appeal to lie.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acuff's Appeal, 9 A. 319, 6 Sadler 291, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 618 (Pa. 1887).

9 A. 319 (Acuff's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rangel v. Berryhill
N.D. California, 2020