Active Care Med. Supply Corp. v. American Tr. Ins. Co.
Opinion
against
American Transit Ins. Co., Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Daniel J. Tucker, Esq. (Daniel J. Tucker and Netanel BenChaim of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Katherine A. Levine, J.), entered June 30, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.
For the reasons stated in Active Care Med. Supply Corp., as Assignee of Munoz, Lina M. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (__ Misc 3d ___, 2018 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2015-2178 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: June 01, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Active Care Med. Supply Corp. v. American Tr. Ins. Co. (Active Care Med. Supply Corp. v. American Tr. Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.