Action Line Transfer v. Burgos

580 So. 2d 878, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5414, 1991 WL 90970
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 3, 1991
DocketNo. 90-3830
StatusPublished

This text of 580 So. 2d 878 (Action Line Transfer v. Burgos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Action Line Transfer v. Burgos, 580 So. 2d 878, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5414, 1991 WL 90970 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition arguing that the Judge of Compensation Claims lacks jurisdiction to resolve a billing dispute between the employer/carrier and a treating physician. The facts and, indeed, one of the parties are identical to Atlantic Foundation v. Gurlacz, 582 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is granted with directions to the Judge of Compensations Claims to dismiss the claim of the treating physician for lack of jurisdiction.

PETITION GRANTED.

SHIVERS, C.J., and NIMMONS and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlantic Foundation v. Gurlacz
582 So. 2d 10 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 So. 2d 878, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5414, 1991 WL 90970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/action-line-transfer-v-burgos-fladistctapp-1991.