ACTCHEM, Inc. and Dr. John Hancock v. Valero RefininG -Texas, L.P., Valero Refining Company-Tennessee, L.L.C., Valero Refining-New Orleans, L.L.C., and Valero Refining COmpany-New Jersey

Court of Appeals of Texas

ACTCHEM, Inc. and Dr. John Hancock v. Valero RefininG -Texas, L.P., Valero Refining Company-Tennessee, L.L.C., Valero Refining-New Orleans, L.L.C., and Valero Refining COmpany-New Jersey

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 29, 2011·No. 14-11-00871-CV·Published

Opinion

November 29, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ACTCHEM, INC. AND DR. JOHN HANCOCK, Appellants

NO. 14-11-00871-CV V.

VALERO REFINING-TEXAS, L.P., VALERO REFINING COMPANY-TENNESSEE, L.L.C., VALERO REFINING-NEW ORLEANS, L.L.C., AND VALERO REFINING COMPANY-NEW JERSEY, Appellees

Today the Court heard appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on September 13, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by ACTCHEM, INC. AND DR. JOHN HANCOCK, jointly and severally.

We further order this decision certified below for observance. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

November 29, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ACTCHEM, INC. AND DR. JOHN HANCOCK, Appellants

NO. 14-11-00871-CV V.

VALERO REFINING-TEXAS, L.P., VALERO REFINING COMPANY-TENNESSEE, L.L.C., VALERO REFINING-NEW ORLEANS, L.L.C., AND VALERO REFINING COMPANY-NEW JERSEY, Appellees

Today the Court heard appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on September 13, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by ACTCHEM, INC. AND DR. JOHN HANCOCK, jointly and severally.

We further order this decision certified below for observance. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.

ACTCHEM, Inc. and Dr. John Hancock v. Valero RefininG -Texas, L.P., Valero Refining Company-Tennessee, L.L.C., Valero Refining-New Orleans, L.L.C., and Valero Refining COmpany-New Jersey, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

ACTCHEM, Inc. and Dr. John Hancock v. Valero RefininG -Texas, L.P., Valero Refining Company-Tennessee, L.L.C., Valero Refining-New Orleans, L.L.C., and Valero Refining COmpany-New Jersey (ACTCHEM, Inc. and Dr. John Hancock v. Valero RefininG -Texas, L.P., Valero Refining Company-Tennessee, L.L.C., Valero Refining-New Orleans, L.L.C., and Valero Refining COmpany-New Jersey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.