Acrocrete, Inc. v. Derck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Acrocrete, Inc. v. Derck

935 So. 2d 594, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195, 2006 WL 2251863

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 2006·No. No. 1D06-0024·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The circuit court has certified that the missing portion of the transcript cannot be reconstructed and that the parties cannot prepare a stipulated statement of the evidence or obtain an approved statement of the evidence pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200. Accordingly, the final order is reversed and remanded for a new final hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALLEN, DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The circuit court has certified that the missing portion of the transcript cannot be reconstructed and that the parties cannot prepare a stipulated statement of the evidence or obtain an approved statement of the evidence pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200. Accordingly, the final order is reversed and remanded for a new final hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALLEN, DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Acrocrete, Inc. v. Derck, 935 So. 2d 594, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195, 2006 WL 2251863 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

935 So. 2d 594 (Acrocrete, Inc. v. Derck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.