Acree v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Acree v. State

170 S.E. 406, 47 Ga. App. 298

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 2, 1933

Docket23308

StatusPublished

This text of 170 S.E. 406 (Acree v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Acree v. State, 170 S.E. 406, 47 Ga. App. 298 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The trial judge stating in his order in reference to tlie amendment to the motion for a new trial that “it is not approved as true,” the amendment can not be considered by this court.

2. While the evidence as to the guilt of the defendant was in sharp conflict, it authorized the verdict; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, and no error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The trial judge stating in his order in reference to tlie amendment to the motion for a new trial that “it is not approved as true,” the amendment can not be considered by this court.

2. While the evidence as to the guilt of the defendant was in sharp conflict, it authorized the verdict; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, and no error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 S.E. 406, 47 Ga. App. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acree-v-state-gactapp-1933.