Acree v. Snow

D.C. Circuit

Acree v. Snow

78 F. App'x 133

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 7, 2003·No. No. 03-5195·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of counsel. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in Smith v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 346 F.3d 264 (2d Cir.2003).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely disposition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41(a)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of counsel. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in Smith v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 346 F.3d 264 (2d Cir.2003).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely disposition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41(a)(1).

Acree v. Snow, 78 F. App'x 133 (D.C. Cir. 2003).

Pincite

78 F. App'x 133 (Acree v. Snow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related