Acree v. Ragsdale

4 S.E.2d 708, 60 Ga. App. 717, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 151
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 29, 1939·No. 27793·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Felton, J.

The selling of malt beverages in this State is a mere privilege, and involves no personal or property right. McKown v. Atlanta, 184 Ga. 221 (190 S. E. 571). The revocation of a permit granting such a privilege, whether with or without a hearing, or for cause or without cause, is therefore not a judicial act and is not reviewable by certiorari. Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Public Service Commission, 181 Ga. 75 (181 S. E. 834, 102 A. L. R. 517), and cit. It was not error to dismiss the certiorari seeking to review the action of the commissioners of Fulton County in revoking the permit to sell malt beverages.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acree v. Ragsdale, 4 S.E.2d 708, 60 Ga. App. 717, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 151 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939).

4 S.E.2d 708 (Acree v. Ragsdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Georgia Oilmen's Ass'n v. Department of Revenue
582 S.E.2d 549 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)
Dougherty County Council of Architects v. Beckanstin
110 S.E.2d 85 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Lamb v. Fedderwitz
22 S.E.2d 657 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)