Acree v. Ragsdale

4 S.E.2d 708, 60 Ga. App. 717, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 151
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 29, 1939
Docket27793
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 4 S.E.2d 708 (Acree v. Ragsdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acree v. Ragsdale, 4 S.E.2d 708, 60 Ga. App. 717, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 151 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Felton, J.

The selling of malt beverages in this State is a mere privilege, and involves no personal or property right. McKown v. Atlanta, 184 Ga. 221 (190 S. E. 571). The revocation of a permit granting such a privilege, whether with or without a hearing, or for cause or without cause, is therefore not a judicial act and is not reviewable by certiorari. Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Public Service Commission, 181 Ga. 75 (181 S. E. 834, 102 A. L. R. 517), and cit. It was not error to dismiss the certiorari seeking to review the action of the commissioners of Fulton County in revoking the permit to sell malt beverages.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Oilmen's Ass'n v. Department of Revenue
582 S.E.2d 549 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)
Dougherty County Council of Architects v. Beckanstin
110 S.E.2d 85 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Lamb v. Fedderwitz
22 S.E.2d 657 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 S.E.2d 708, 60 Ga. App. 717, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acree-v-ragsdale-gactapp-1939.