Acree Oil Co. v. Department of Transportation

474 S.E.2d 770, 222 Ga. App. 448, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 2987, 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 863
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Acree Oil Co. v. Department of Transportation. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 Ga. App. 586
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 8, 1996·No. A94A2052·Published

Opinion

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

In Dept. of Transp. v. Acree Oil Co., 266 Ga. 336 (467 SE2d 319), the Supreme Court reversed our ruling in Acree Oil Co. v. Dept. of Transp., 216 Ga. App. 586 (455 SE2d 590) as to the admissibility of certain evidence of business losses in this particular condemnation case. The Supreme Court having held that the trial court “did not abuse its discretion by excluding Aeree Oil’s speculative evidence of its business losses,” Dept. of Transp., 266 Ga. at 337 (2), we hereby vacate our ruling on that point and we affirm the judgment below, there being no other discernible enumerations of error requiring reconsideration.

Judgment affirmed.

Blackburn and Ruffin, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acree Oil Co. v. Department of Transportation, 474 S.E.2d 770, 222 Ga. App. 448, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 2987, 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 863 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996).

474 S.E.2d 770 (Acree Oil Co. v. Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Department of Transportation v. Acree Oil Co.
467 S.E.2d 319 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Acree Oil Co. v. Department of Transportation
455 S.E.2d 590 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)