Acre v. Acre

280 So. 2d 70, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7827
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 13, 1973·No. No. 73-198·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon careful consideration of the arguments of counsel and a review of the record in this cause we are of the opinion that the order of the lower court denying alimony pending appeal was an abuse of discretion. See Sharpe v. Sharpe, Fla.App. 1972, 267 So.2d 665. Accordingly, that portion of the order denying alimony pending appeal is quashed and the cause remanded to the trial court for the purpose of determining alimony pending appeal. Cf. Rule 3.8(b), F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.

Reversed and remanded.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acre v. Acre, 280 So. 2d 70, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7827 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

280 So. 2d 70 (Acre v. Acre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharpe v. Sharpe
267 So. 2d 665 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)