Acquard v. Acquard

244 A.D.2d 1010, 666 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12495
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1997·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—Motion for leave to appeal and for a stay denied. Memorandum: Contrary to the statement of Family Court, it is well settled that, absent extraordinary or exigent circumstances, temporary custody should not be transferred without an evidentiary hearing in a proceeding in which there are controverted allegations (see, Kronenberger v Kronenberger, 204 AD2d 1059; see also, Hizme v Hizme, 212 AD2d 580). The transcript of the in camera interview supports the court’s implicit finding of exigent cir[1011]*1011cumstances in this case. Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ. (Filed Oct. 31, 1997.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acquard v. Acquard, 244 A.D.2d 1010, 666 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 1010 (Acquard v. Acquard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MORRISSEY, SR., DAVID M. v. MORRISSEY, DEBRA A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Morrissey v. Morrissey
124 A.D.3d 1367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
WARD, JON v. WARD, TRACY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
Ward v. Ward
89 A.D.3d 1518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Nicole JJ.
265 A.D.2d 29 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)