Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Acquard v. Acquard

Acquard v. Acquard

244 A.D.2d 1010, 666 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12495
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 1010 (Acquard v. Acquard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acquard v. Acquard, 244 A.D.2d 1010, 666 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Motion for leave to appeal and for a stay denied. Memorandum: Contrary to the statement of Family Court, it is well settled that, absent extraordinary or exigent circumstances, temporary custody should not be transferred without an evidentiary hearing in a proceeding in which there are controverted allegations (see, Kronenberger v Kronenberger, 204 AD2d 1059; see also, Hizme v Hizme, 212 AD2d 580). The transcript of the in camera interview supports the court’s implicit finding of exigent cir[1011]*1011cumstances in this case. Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ. (Filed Oct. 31, 1997.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MORRISSEY, SR., DAVID M. v. MORRISSEY, DEBRA A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Morrissey v. Morrissey
124 A.D.3d 1367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
WARD, JON v. WARD, TRACY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
Ward v. Ward
89 A.D.3d 1518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Nicole JJ.
265 A.D.2d 29 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 A.D.2d 1010, 666 N.Y.S.2d 57, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acquard-v-acquard-nyappdiv-1997.