Acosta v. State
738 So. 2d 487, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10424, 1999 WL 564647
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 4, 1999·No. No. 98-1663·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
There is no merit in the defendant’s claim of error in his conviction for second [488]*488degree murder with a firearm, which is affirmed. The separate conviction for possession of a firearm in the commission of the second degree murder, however, is impermissibly duplicitous and is therefore vacated. See Sales v. State, 653 So.2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Galban v. State, 605 So.2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
Affirmed in part, vacated in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Acosta v. State, 738 So. 2d 487, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10424, 1999 WL 564647 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
738 So. 2d 487 (Acosta v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
RYAN DENARD LEE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
Gantorius v. State
761 So. 2d 488 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)