Home/New York Court of Appeals/Acosta v. Previte

Acosta v. Previte

349 N.E.2d 865, 39 N.Y.2d 720, 384 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2687
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 2, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 349 N.E.2d 865 (Acosta v. Previte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acosta v. Previte, 349 N.E.2d 865, 39 N.Y.2d 720, 384 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2687 (N.Y. 1976).

Opinion

Memorandum. In the procedural posture in which this proceeding comes to us we review questions of law only (CPLR 5501, subd [b]). Petitioners did not sustain their burden of proving the invalidity of the petition, either by proof of permeating fraud or of such other irregularities as to nullify it. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Salka v. Magee
2018 NY Slip Op 5910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Stavisky v. Lee
142 A.D.3d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Powell v. Tendy
131 A.D.3d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Blostein v. Bauer
218 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Lepke v. Harris
141 Misc. 2d 765 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)
Codd v. Barbaro
111 Misc. 2d 135 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
349 N.E.2d 865, 39 N.Y.2d 720, 384 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acosta-v-previte-ny-1976.