Acosta v. Kirchmeyer & Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Acosta v. Kirchmeyer & Associates, Inc.

28 A.D.3d 1225, 813 N.Y.S.2d 689

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 2006

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.D.3d 1225 (Acosta v. Kirchmeyer & Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Acosta v. Kirchmeyer & Associates, Inc., 28 A.D.3d 1225, 813 N.Y.S.2d 689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered November 9, 2004. The amended order granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment determining that a restrictive covenant is unenforceable and permanently enjoining defendant from enforcing or attempting to enforce the restrictive covenant.

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on January 24, 2006, and filed in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office on January 27, 2006,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Kehoe, Pine and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered November 9, 2004. The amended order granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment determining that a restrictive covenant is unenforceable and permanently enjoining defendant from enforcing or attempting to enforce the restrictive covenant.

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on January 24, 2006, and filed in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office on January 27, 2006,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Kehoe, Pine and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.D.3d 1225, 813 N.Y.S.2d 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acosta-v-kirchmeyer-associates-inc-nyappdiv-2006.