Acosta v. Gold Coast Beverage Distributors Inc.

711 So. 2d 1389, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7890, 1998 WL 347564
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 1, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2284
StatusPublished

This text of 711 So. 2d 1389 (Acosta v. Gold Coast Beverage Distributors Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acosta v. Gold Coast Beverage Distributors Inc., 711 So. 2d 1389, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7890, 1998 WL 347564 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Carlos A. Acosta, appeals from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission that reversed the decision of the appeals referee awarding unemployment compensation benefits. We reverse.

A review of the record indicates that the claimant’s actions were nothing more than an isolated incident of poor judgment, and therefore, not deemed “misconduct” within the meaning of section 443.036(26), Florida Statutes (1995). See Bulkan v. Florida Unemployment Comm’n, 648 So.2d 846 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bulkan v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS
648 So. 2d 846 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
711 So. 2d 1389, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7890, 1998 WL 347564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acosta-v-gold-coast-beverage-distributors-inc-fladistctapp-1998.