Acosta v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

78 So. 3d 16, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16999, 2011 WL 5061163
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 2011·No. 3D11-1075·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Chacon v. Joell Designers Corp., 17 So.3d 716 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Saintil v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 944 So.2d 1228 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Torre v. New Century Mortg. Corp., 935 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acosta v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, 78 So. 3d 16, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16999, 2011 WL 5061163 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

78 So. 3d 16 (Acosta v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chacon v. Joell Designers Corp.
17 So. 3d 716 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Saintil v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
944 So. 2d 1228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
De La Torre v. New Century Mortgage Corp.
935 So. 2d 1264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)