Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Acosta v. F & R SCAFFOLDS, INC.

Acosta v. F & R SCAFFOLDS, INC.

997 So. 2d 1279, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 44, 2009 WL 30256
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 7, 2009
Docket3D08-1338
StatusPublished

This text of 997 So. 2d 1279 (Acosta v. F & R SCAFFOLDS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acosta v. F & R SCAFFOLDS, INC., 997 So. 2d 1279, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 44, 2009 WL 30256 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

997 So.2d 1279 (2009)

Jose Francisco ACOSTA, Appellant,
v.
F & R SCAFFOLDS, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D08-1338.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 7, 2009.

Thomas E. Elfers, Miami, for appellant.

Abadin Cook, Aldo M. Leiva, and Erin E. Dardis, Miami, for appellee, F & R Scaffolds, Inc.

Before GERSTEN, C.J., and SUAREZ and CORTIÑAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Jose Francisco Acosta ("Acosta") appeals from the trial court's order denying plaintiff's second petition for writ of mandamus or alternatively, motion to compel business records. Because we find this order is non-final and non-appealable, we dismiss the appeal for lack jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130. We also exercise our discretion and decline to entertain the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c).

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
997 So. 2d 1279, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 44, 2009 WL 30256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acosta-v-f-r-scaffolds-inc-fladistctapp-2009.