Acosta v. Doe

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Acosta v. Doe

345 So. 2d 48, 1977 La. LEXIS 5724

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 27, 1977·No. No. 59592·Published

Opinion

In re: Zelia Acosta applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 342 So.2d 1241, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. John the Baptist.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.

TATE, J., is of the opinion that the court of appeal erred in disturbing the trier of fact’s reasoned evaluation of the facts of the injury and its much — discretion in the award of damages therefor. DIXON, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. DENNIS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Zelia Acosta applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 342 So.2d 1241, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. John the Baptist.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.

TATE, J., is of the opinion that the court of appeal erred in disturbing the trier of fact’s reasoned evaluation of the facts of the injury and its much — discretion in the award of damages therefor. DIXON, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. DENNIS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

Acosta v. Doe, 345 So. 2d 48, 1977 La. LEXIS 5724 (La. 1977).

Pincite

345 So. 2d 48 (Acosta v. Doe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related