Acosta v. Creative Group Investments, Inc.

790 So. 2d 518, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9170, 2001 WL 746656
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 5, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-2582
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 790 So. 2d 518 (Acosta v. Creative Group Investments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acosta v. Creative Group Investments, Inc., 790 So. 2d 518, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9170, 2001 WL 746656 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. “Findings of fact by a trial judge in a non-jury proceeding will not be set aside on review unless totally unsupported by competent and substantial evidence.” Lee v. Lee, 563 So.2d 754 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). “Competent, substantial evidence is ‘such evidence as will establish a substantial basis of fact from which the fact at issue can reasonably be inferred [or] ... such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind would accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’ ” Duval Util. Co. v. Florida Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 380 So.2d 1028, 1031 (Fla.1980). Here, the trial court found that the appellant, Anthony Acosta, had the ability to pay $500 per month after careful review of his financial affidavit.1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carnival Corp. v. Mendoza
949 So. 2d 1154 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
790 So. 2d 518, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9170, 2001 WL 746656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acosta-v-creative-group-investments-inc-fladistctapp-2001.