Acosta v. Acosta

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Acosta v. Acosta

425 So. 2d 667, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27724

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 1, 1983

DocketNos. 82-696, 82-923 and 82-982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 425 So. 2d 667 (Acosta v. Acosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Acosta v. Acosta, 425 So. 2d 667, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27724 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

By virtue both of the controlling- and unanimous cases, e.g., Erspan v. Badgett, 659 F.2d 26 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 945, 102 S.Ct. 1443, 71 L.Ed.2d 658 (1982) and a subsequently enacted statute, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act, 10 U.S.C. 1408(c)(1) (1982), the Supreme Court decision in McCarty v. McCarty, 453 U.S. 210, 101 S.Ct. 2728, 69 L.Ed.2d 589 (1981) may not be retroactively applied. We therefore reject the appellant’s primary contention. His other points merit neither reversal nor discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

By virtue both of the controlling- and unanimous cases, e.g., Erspan v. Badgett, 659 F.2d 26 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 945, 102 S.Ct. 1443, 71 L.Ed.2d 658 (1982) and a subsequently enacted statute, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act, 10 U.S.C. 1408(c)(1) (1982), the Supreme Court decision in McCarty v. McCarty, 453 U.S. 210, 101 S.Ct. 2728, 69 L.Ed.2d 589 (1981) may not be retroactively applied. We therefore reject the appellant’s primary contention. His other points merit neither reversal nor discussion.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

425 So. 2d 667, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acosta-v-acosta-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack