Acorn v. Maas

580 N.E.2d 761, 78 N.Y.2d 1001, 575 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4143
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 19, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 580 N.E.2d 761 (Acorn v. Maas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acorn v. Maas, 580 N.E.2d 761, 78 N.Y.2d 1001, 575 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4143 (N.Y. 1991).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that movant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chemical Waste Management of Indiana, L.L.C. v. City of New Haven
755 N.E.2d 624 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2001)
Crum v. AVCO Financial Services of Indianapolis, Inc.
552 N.E.2d 823 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 N.E.2d 761, 78 N.Y.2d 1001, 575 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acorn-v-maas-ny-1991.