Acorn v. Maas
580 N.E.2d 761, 78 N.Y.2d 1001, 575 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4143
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that movant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Acorn v. Maas, 580 N.E.2d 761, 78 N.Y.2d 1001, 575 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4143 (N.Y. 1991).
580 N.E.2d 761 (Acorn v. Maas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chemical Waste Management of Indiana, L.L.C. v. City of New Haven
755 N.E.2d 624 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2001)
Crum v. AVCO Financial Services of Indianapolis, Inc.
552 N.E.2d 823 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1990)