ACORN INVESTMENT COMPANY v. McKELTON
722 N.W.2d 870, 477 Mich. 917
This text of 722 N.W.2d 870 (ACORN INVESTMENT COMPANY v. McKELTON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
ACORN INVESTMENT COMPANY v. McKELTON, 722 N.W.2d 870, 477 Mich. 917 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
ACORN INVESTMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Antonio McKELTON, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Argent Mortgage Company, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant, and
Armour Norris, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and
Ace I Title Agency, L.L.C., Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
722 N.W.2d 870, 477 Mich. 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acorn-investment-company-v-mckelton-mich-2006.