Acoolla v. Angelone

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 17, 2007
Docket06-7691
StatusUnpublished

This text of Acoolla v. Angelone (Acoolla v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acoolla v. Angelone, (4th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7691

SHAKA ZULU ACOOLLA, a/k/a Thomas Jackson,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, in his individual and official capacities; GENE JOHNSON, in his individual and official capacities; D. J. ARMSTRONG, in his individual and official capacities; LEWIS B. CEI, in his individual and official capacities; D. MILLS, in his individual and official capacities; VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, sued in their individual and official capacities; L. W. HUFFMAN, sued in his individual and official capacities; D. A. BRAXTON, sued in his individual capacity; B. J. WHEELER, sued in his individual capacity; LIEUTENANT PIEROTTI, sued in his individual capacity; G. K. WASHINGTON, sued in his individual and official capacities; LIEUTENANT SEAY, sued in his individual and official capacities; M. E. HANKINS, sued in his individual and official capacities; R. T. FRANCIS, Sergeant, sued in his individual and official capacities; R. L. ADDAMS, sued in his individual and official capacities; B. BOOKER, sued in his individual and official capacities; C. WINGFIELD, sued in his individual and official capacities; L. T. EDMONDS, sued in his individual and official capacities; D. H. LEWIS, sued in his individual and official capacities; SERGEANT CATRON, sued in his individual and official capacities; K. HARRISON, sued in his individual and official capacities; LIEUTENANT TERRY, in his individual, and official capacities; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TERRY, sued in his individual and official capacities; T. E. BRIGGS, sued in his individual and official capacities; L. M. SAUNDERS, sued in his individual and official capacities; L. R. DAY, sued in his individual and official capacities; T. T. REDMAN, sued in his individual and official capacities; D. PULTZ, sued in his individual and official capacities; T. LAWHORN, sued in his individual and official capacities; LIEUTENANT DEOLY, sued in his individual and official capacities; G. S. DEFIBAUGH, sued in his individual and official capacities; T. C. ROVELLI, sued in his individual and official capacities; SERGEANT MADDOX, sued in his individual and official capacities; SERGEANT BANKS, sued in his individual and official capacities; R. D. BOYERS, sued in his individual and official capacities; M. PETERS, sued in his individual and official capacities; P. MASSIE, sued in his individual and official capacities; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HARLOW, sued in his individual and official capacities; V. S. GRAY, a/k/a S. Gray, sued in his individual and official capacities; T. A. MARTIN, sued in his individual and official capacities; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER NEWCOMBS, sued in his individual and official capacities; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CASH, sued in his individual and official capacities; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ENURIAN, sued in his individual and official capacities; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MAUZY, sued in his individual and official capacities; R. F. WILSON, sued in his individual and official capacities; R. A. YOUNG, sued in his individual and official capacities; L. W. JARVIS, sued in his individual and official capacities; P. E. MADDOX, sued in his individual and official capacities; V. J. BANDY, sued in his individual and official capacities; K. A. POLINSKY, sued in his individual and official capacities; CLARENCE A. HOLLAR, sued in his individual and official capacities; R. S. JACKSON, sued in his individual and official capacities; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PIRES, sued in his

- 2 - individual and official capacities; L. DAVENPORT,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Intervenor.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:01-cv-01008-jct)

Submitted: January 17, 2007 Decided: August 17, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shaka Zulu Acoolla, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 3 - PER CURIAM:

Shaka Zulu Acoolla appeals the district court’s order

granting relief to the defendants and dismissing his claims under

the First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and

Institutionalized Persons Act. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Acoolla v. Angelone, No. 7:01-

cv-01008-jct (W.D. Va. Sept. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 4 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Acoolla v. Angelone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acoolla-v-angelone-ca4-2007.