Acme Watch Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Acme Watch Co. v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 377, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 143

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 24, 1952

DocketNo. 56303; protests 128998-K, etc. (Los Angeles)

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Cust. Ct. 377 (Acme Watch Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Acme Watch Co. v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 377, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 143 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the appraisements of the merchandise and the liquidations of the entries were made in the same manner,.under facts and circumstances the same in all material respects, as the appraisement and liquidation in The Gruen Watch Company v. United States (24 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 1216). In accordance with stipulation and following the cited authority the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. It was further held that legal liquidations should be had which would form the basis for protests in which, should they so desire, the importers may litigate any questions presented by such action under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the appraisements of the merchandise and the liquidations of the entries were made in the same manner,.under facts and circumstances the same in all material respects, as the appraisement and liquidation in The Gruen Watch Company v. United States (24 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 1216). In accordance with stipulation and following the cited authority the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. It was further held that legal liquidations should be had which would form the basis for protests in which, should they so desire, the importers may litigate any questions presented by such action under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Cust. Ct. 377, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acme-watch-co-v-united-states-cusc-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack