Acme Ring Mfg. Co. v. United States
25 Cust. Ct. 305, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 432
United States Customs Court·Decided November 1, 1950·No. No. 54807; protests 138355-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones or semiprecious stones, cut but not set, suitable for use in the manufacture of jewelry, the same in all material respects as those the subject of S. Nathan & Co., Inc. v. United States (37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Acme Ring Mfg. Co. v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 305, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 432 (cusc 1950).
25 Cust. Ct. 305 (Acme Ring Mfg. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.