Acme Radio & Television, Inc. v. Childers

183 So. 2d 42, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5499
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 1966
DocketNo. 5348
StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 2d 42 (Acme Radio & Television, Inc. v. Childers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Acme Radio & Television, Inc. v. Childers, 183 So. 2d 42, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5499 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Defendants in a negligence action arising out of an automobile collision bring this appeal from a final judgment of the [43]*43trial court entered upon a jury verdict awarding damages to Plaintiffs.

This is a typical case in which the parties disagreed as to the nature of the accident requiring that it be submitted to the jury. The jury accepted the version of Plaintiffs. The trial court correctly denied Plaintiffs’ motion for directed verdict.

Insurance was inadvertently mentioned at the trial. The trial court properly denied Defendants’ motion for a mistrial. See Ryan v. Noble, 95 Fla. 830, 116 So. 766; Douglass v. Galvin, Fla.App., 130 So.2d 282.

Affirmed.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., HOBSON, J., and HEWITT, ROBERT S., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Douglass v. Galvin
130 So. 2d 282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Ryan v. Noble
116 So. 766 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 So. 2d 42, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acme-radio-television-inc-v-childers-fladistctapp-1966.