Acme Laces, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Acme Laces, Inc. v. United States

25 Cust. Ct. 318, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 499

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 21, 1950

DocketNo. 54874; protests 155951-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Cust. Ct. 318 (Acme Laces, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Acme Laces, Inc. v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 318, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 499 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Cust. Ct. 318, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acme-laces-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1950.