Acme Blacktop Paving Corp. v. Brown & Matthews, Inc.

30 A.D.2d 1042, 294 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3020
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 1968·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: The assignment by plaintiff to United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company of all its right, title and interest to moneys due or to become due under the contract with defendants-appellants, including all claims for extra work, is complete and unequivocal. As the assignment now stands, plaintiff has no interest in the proceeds of the contract and therefore may not maintain the present action. (Cummings v. Morris, 25 N. Y. 625, 627.) If the assignment in its present form does not correctly express the intention of the parties, plaintiff may seek reformation of the instrument. (6 N Y Jur., Reformation of Instruments, § 41; Brandwein v. Provident Mut. Life Ins. Co., 3 N Y 2d 491, 496.) (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term, denying motion to dismiss complaint in action on contract.) Present — Bastow, P. J., Williams, Del Vecchio, Marsh and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acme Blacktop Paving Corp. v. Brown & Matthews, Inc., 30 A.D.2d 1042, 294 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

30 A.D.2d 1042 (Acme Blacktop Paving Corp. v. Brown & Matthews, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related