Acme American Repairs, Inc. v. Uretsky

878 N.E.2d 598, 9 N.Y.3d 979, 848 N.Y.S.2d 15, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 3294
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 2007·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acme American Repairs, Inc. v. Uretsky, 878 N.E.2d 598, 9 N.Y.3d 979, 848 N.Y.S.2d 15, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 3294 (N.Y. 2007).

878 N.E.2d 598 (Acme American Repairs, Inc. v. Uretsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Estate of Terry
77 A.D.3d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Peterson v. Neville
58 A.D.3d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Vick v. Albert
47 A.D.3d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)