Home/Sixth Circuit/ACLU of OH v. Capitol Sq Review

ACLU of OH v. Capitol Sq Review

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2001·No. 98-4106·Published

Opinion

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS

81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

$0(5,&$1 &,9,/ /,%(57,(6 ; 81,21 2) 2+,2 DQG 7+(  5(9(5(1' 0$77+(:   1R 3(7(5621  3ODLQWLIIV$SSHOODQWV !   Y   &$3,72/ 648$5( 5(9,(:  $1' $'9,625< %2$5'   52%(57 7$)7*RYHUQRURI  2KLR521$/' 5 .(//(5  ([HFXWLYH'LUHFWRURIWKH  %RDUG '$1,(/  6+(//(1%$5*(5 $VVLVWDQW  'LUHFWRURIWKH%RDUG   5,&+$5' + ),1$1 2KLR  6WDWH6HQDWRU s .(11(7+  %/$&.:(//6HFUHWDU\RI  6WDWHDQG7+20$6 0 =$,12  7D[&RPPLVVLRQHU  'HIHQGDQWV$SSHOOHHV  1 $SSHDOIURPWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW IRUWKH6RXWKHUQ'LVWULFWRI2KLRDW&ROXPEXV 1RnsDPHV/*UDKDP'LVWULFWsXGJH

  $P&LYLO/LEHUWLHV8QLRQRI2KLRHWDO 1R Y&DSLWRO6TXDUH5HYLHZHWDO

$UJXHG'HFHPEHU 'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG0DUFK %HIRUH0$57,1&KLHIsXGJH0(55,771(/621 %2**61255,668+5+(,15,&+6,/(5 %$7&+(/'(5'$8*+75(<0225(&2/(&/$< DQG*,/0$1&LUFXLWsXGJHV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB &2816(/ $5*8('  0DUN % &RKQ 0F&$57+< /(%,7 &5<67$/  +$,0$1&OHYHODQG2KLRIRU$SSHOODQWV 'DYLG 0 *RUPOH\ 2)),&( 2) 7+( $77251(< *(1(5$/ 2) 2+,2 &ROXPEXV 2KLR IRU $SSHOOHHV 21 %5,()  0DUN % &RKQ 0F&$57+< /(%,7 &5<67$/ +$,0$1&OHYHODQG2KLR6XVDQ%*HOOPDQ :2/0$1*(16+$)7 *(//0$1&ROXPEXV2KLR 7KRPDV'%XFNOH\sU5D\PRQG9DVYDULsU$&/82) 2+,2 )281'$7,21 ,1& &OHYHODQG 2KLR IRU $SSHOODQWV'DYLG0*RUPOH\(GZDUG%)ROH\2)),&( 2) 7+( $77251(< *(1(5$/ 2) 2+,2 &ROXPEXV 2KLR IRU $SSHOOHHV  sHIIUH\ 6 6XWWRQ s21(6 '$< 5($9,6  32*8( &ROXPEXV 2KLR IRU $PLFL &XULDH )5$1./,1&2817<2+,25212j%5,(1)5$1./,1 &2817<3526(&87,1*$77251(<DQGWKHs(:,6+ 32/,&<&(17(5'DYLG5+XJJLQV1$7,21$//(*$/ )281'$7,219LUJLQLD%HDFK9LUJLQLDIRU$PLFL&XULDH WKH $0(5,&$1 )$0,/< $662&,$7,21 2) 2+,2 &,7,=(16 )25 &20081,7< 9$/8(6 )$0,/< )5,(1'/< /,%5$5,(6 2) 2+,2 0(',1$ &2817< &+5,67,$1&2$/,7,21&+5,67,$1&2$/,7,212) 2+,2DQG758(%/8(3$75,276sRKQ*6WHSKDQRYLFK DQG6KDZQ$9R\OHV9LUJLQLD%HDFK9LUJLQLDIRU$PLFXV &XULDHWKH$0(5,&$1&(17(5)25/$: s867,&( 0,'$7/$17,&6WHYHQ.*UHHQ$0(5,&$1681,7(' )25 6(3$5$7,21 2) &+85&+ $1' 67$7(  $P&LYLO/LEHUWLHV8QLRQRI2KLRHWDO 1R 1R $P&LYLO/LEHUWLHV8QLRQRI2KLRHWDO  Y&DSLWRO6TXDUH5HYLHZHWDO Y&DSLWRO6TXDUH5HYLHZHWDO

RIIHQVLYH7KRXJKWKHSRUWUDLWOLNHVFKRROSUD\HUVDQG :DVKLQJWRQ '& DQG 'DYLG 0 /HYLQH %(1(6&+ RWKHUVHFWDULDQUHOLJLRXVULWXDOVDQGV\PEROVPD\VHHP )5,('/$1'(5&23/$1 $5212))&OHYHODQG2KLR mGH PLQLPLVl WR WKH JUHDW PDMRULW\ SDUWLFXODUO\ WKRVH IRU $PLFL &XULDH $0(5,&$16 81,7(' )25 UDLVHGLQWKH&KULVWLDQIDLWKDQGWKRVHZKRGRQRWFDUH 6(3$5$7,212)&+85&+$1'67$7(DQG7+($17, DERXWUHOLJLRQDIHZVHHLWDVDJRYHUQPHQWDOVWDWHPHQW '()$0$7,21/($*8( IDYRULQJRQHUHOLJLRXVJURXSDQGGRZQSOD\LQJRWKHUV,W LVWKHULJKWVRIWKHVHIHZWKDWWKH(VWDEOLVKPHQW&ODXVH 1(/621sGHOLYHUHGWKHRSLQLRQRIWKHFRXUWLQZKLFK SURWHFWVLQWKLVFDVH %2**6 1255,6 68+5+(,15,&+ 6,/(5 %$7&+(/'(5&2/(DQG*,/0$1ssMRLQHG&/$< :DVKHJHVLFY%ORRPLQJGDOH3XE6FKRRO)G s SS   GHOLYHUHG D VHSDUDWH FRQFXUULQJ RSLQLRQ WK&LU FHUWGHQLHG86   0$57,1&s SS DQG0(55,77s SS  GHOLYHUHGVHSDUDWHGLVVHQWLQJRSLQLRQVZLWK0$57,1&s :KHWKHU E\ LQYRNLQJ KLV ZRUGV RU KLV LPDJH WKH 6WDWH '$8*+75(< DQG 0225( ss MRLQLQJ LQ sXGJH VKRXOGQRWDOLJQLWVHOIZLWKsHVXV&KULVW

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ACLU of OH v. Capitol Sq Review, (6th Cir. 2001).

ACLU of OH v. Capitol Sq Review (ACLU of OH v. Capitol Sq Review) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.