Ackridge v. Ekpe

42 A.D.3d 827, 838 N.Y.S.2d 922
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 26, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 A.D.3d 827 (Ackridge v. Ekpe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ackridge v. Ekpe, 42 A.D.3d 827, 838 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

[828]*828Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with creating a disturbance following an incident in which he yelled at a correction officer for failing to notarize a legal document. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier II disciplinary hearing, and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge that determination.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who authored it, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Martin v Goord, 36 AD3d 977 [2007]; Matter of Raqiyb v Goord, 30 AD3d 810 [2006]). Petitioner’s claim that he did not yell at the officer presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Martin v Goord, supra; Matter of Thomas v Goord, 34 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2006]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions either have not been preserved for our review or are lacking in merit.

Cardona, EJ., Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lara v. Dubray
52 A.D.3d 1143 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 A.D.3d 827, 838 N.Y.S.2d 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ackridge-v-ekpe-nyappdiv-2007.