Ackman v. United States Trust Co.

16 A.D.2d 896, 228 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9231

This text of 16 A.D.2d 896 (Ackman v. United States Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ackman v. United States Trust Co., 16 A.D.2d 896, 228 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9231 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

On this submission under sections 546 and 547 of the Civil Practice Act judgment is-unanimously granted in favor of the defendants, without costs, on the authority of Richardson v. Richardson (298 N. Y. 135) and Matter of Burchell (299 N. Y. 351). (See, also, Matter of Maxted, 5 A D 2d 614, affd. 5 N Y 2d 1034.) Under section 23 of the Personal Property Law as it read at the time the trust was created, the consents to revocation obtained by the plaintiff are not sufficient (Schoellkopf v. Marine Trust Co. of Buffalo, 267 N. Y. 358). The subsequent amendment to the statute (L. 1951, eh. 180) applies only to trusts created after its effective date. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Worm v. United States Trust Co.
87 N.E.2d 293 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)
Schoellkopf v. Marine Trust Co.
196 N.E. 288 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
Richardson v. Richardson
81 N.E.2d 54 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 A.D.2d 896, 228 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ackman-v-united-states-trust-co-nyappdiv-1962.