Ackman v. United States Trust Co.

16 A.D.2d 896, 228 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9231

Opinion

On this submission under sections 546 and 547 of the Civil Practice Act judgment is-unanimously granted in favor of the defendants, without costs, on the authority of Richardson v. Richardson (298 N. Y. 135) and Matter of Burchell (299 N. Y. 351). (See, also, Matter of Maxted, 5 A D 2d 614, affd. 5 N Y 2d 1034.) Under section 23 of the Personal Property Law as it read at the time the trust was created, the consents to revocation obtained by the plaintiff are not sufficient (Schoellkopf v. Marine Trust Co. of Buffalo, 267 N. Y. 358). The subsequent amendment to the statute (L. 1951, eh. 180) applies only to trusts created after its effective date. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ackman v. United States Trust Co., 16 A.D.2d 896, 228 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9231 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

16 A.D.2d 896 (Ackman v. United States Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Worm v. United States Trust Co.
87 N.E.2d 293 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)
Schoellkopf v. Marine Trust Co.
196 N.E. 288 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
Richardson v. Richardson
81 N.E.2d 54 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)