Acklin v. Catholic University of America

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided November 1, 2013·No. Civil Action No. 2013-1250·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________ ) BRIDGETTE A. ACKLIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-1250 (RBW) ) CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY ) OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM

This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss under Rules 12(b)(1)

and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By Order of August 27, 2013, the plaintiff,

proceeding pro se, was advised about responding to the defendant’s motion and the

consequences if she did not respond by September 30, 2013. Specifically, the plaintiff was

warned that her failure to respond by the deadline might result in summary dismissal of the case

on what would be treated as a conceded motion. The plaintiff has neither responded to the

defendant’s motion nor sought additional time to do so. Hence, the Court will grant the

defendant’s motion to dismiss as conceded and will dismiss the case. 1

_______s/______________ Reggie B. Walton DATE: November 1, 2013 United States District Judge

1 A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acklin v. Catholic University of America, (D.D.C. 2013).

Acklin v. Catholic University of America (Acklin v. Catholic University of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.