Acklen v. Illinois Central Railroad

Sixth Circuit

Acklen v. Illinois Central Railroad

116 F.2d 934, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2763

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 11, 1940

DocketNo. 8339

StatusPublished

This text of 116 F.2d 934 (Acklen v. Illinois Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Acklen v. Illinois Central Railroad, 116 F.2d 934, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2763 (6th Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs of counsel and argument by counsel for appellees, and it appearing to .the court that there was no substantial evidence to support a verdict for the appellant, and that there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of .appellant’s motion for a new trial, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from, be and is in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs of counsel and argument by counsel for appellees, and it appearing to .the court that there was no substantial evidence to support a verdict for the appellant, and that there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of .appellant’s motion for a new trial, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from, be and is in all things affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 F.2d 934, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/acklen-v-illinois-central-railroad-ca6-1940.