Acklen v. Illinois Central Railroad

Sixth Circuit

Acklen v. Illinois Central Railroad

116 F.2d 934, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2763

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 11, 1940·No. No. 8339·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs of counsel and argument by counsel for appellees, and it appearing to .the court that there was no substantial evidence to support a verdict for the appellant, and that there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of .appellant’s motion for a new trial, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from, be and is in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs of counsel and argument by counsel for appellees, and it appearing to .the court that there was no substantial evidence to support a verdict for the appellant, and that there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of .appellant’s motion for a new trial, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from, be and is in all things affirmed.

Acklen v. Illinois Central Railroad, 116 F.2d 934, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2763 (6th Cir. 1940).

Pincite

116 F.2d 934 (Acklen v. Illinois Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.