Ackert v. Miller

New York Supreme Court

Ackert v. Miller

26 N.Y.S. 1119, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638

DecidedDecember 1, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 26 N.Y.S. 1119 (Ackert v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ackert v. Miller, 26 N.Y.S. 1119, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This Is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the decision of a judge of this court, before whom the cause was tried without a jury. The action was commenced for the recovery of money due the plaintiffs from the defendant for labor and services performed in the erection of a house, and for bills paid for hauling material to the house. The claim was fully proven, and .the trial judge found all the facts in favor of the plaintiff, and they are amply sufficient to justify the judgment. The appeal is entirely destitute of merit, and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DYKMAN, J.

This Is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the decision of a judge of this court, before whom the cause was tried without a jury. The action was commenced for the recovery of money due the plaintiffs from the defendant for labor and services performed in the erection of a house, and for bills paid for hauling material to the house. The claim was fully proven, and .the trial judge found all the facts in favor of the plaintiff, and they are amply sufficient to justify the judgment. The appeal is entirely destitute of merit, and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 N.Y.S. 1119, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ackert-v-miller-nysupct-1893.