Ackerson v. AGF, Inc.

337 S.W.3d 149, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 340, 2011 WL 900293
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 2011·No. ED 95329·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant Darren Ackerson appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal finding that Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because he committed misconduct connected with work as defined by section 288.030.1(23) RSMo 2009. Claimant contends that the Commission erred in concluding that his actions constituted misconduct. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the order of the administrative agency is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion.would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b)(4).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ackerson v. AGF, Inc., 337 S.W.3d 149, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 340, 2011 WL 900293 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

337 S.W.3d 149 (Ackerson v. AGF, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chastain v. KANSAS CITY MISSOURI CITY CLERK
337 S.W.3d 149 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)