Ackerman v. Price Waterhouse
648 N.E.2d 783, 85 N.Y.2d 836, 624 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 196
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur denied. The remittitur, read together with the December 6, 1994 opinion, pertains only to the April 10, 1990 complaint. [See, 84 NY2d 535.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ackerman v. Price Waterhouse, 648 N.E.2d 783, 85 N.Y.2d 836, 624 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 196 (N.Y. 1995).
648 N.E.2d 783 (Ackerman v. Price Waterhouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dana v. Oak Park Marina, Inc.
230 A.D.2d 204 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Kearney v. Firley
234 A.D.2d 967 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
924 F. Supp. 449 (S.D. New York, 1996)