Ackerman v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

119 A.D. 922

This text of 119 A.D. 922 (Ackerman v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ackerman v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 119 A.D. 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

—Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to ali ide "event; Held, that the questions of sui juris and contributory negli-. gence were for the jury'and not for the court. ■ All Concurred, except- McLennan, - P. J., who dissented and voted for affirmance; Robson, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 A.D. 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ackerman-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1907.