Ackerman v. Lane

256 A.D. 890, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5257

This text of 256 A.D. 890 (Ackerman v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ackerman v. Lane, 256 A.D. 890, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We cannot say that the jury’s determination of the questions of fact as to the time of the accident, the alleged negligence by the defendant Irene W. Lane and the infant-plaintiff’s freedom from fault were against the weight of evidence. Nor do we find an erroneous ruling by which the defendants’ rights were prejudiced. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D. 890, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ackerman-v-lane-nyappdiv-1939.